 |
 |
EGYPTIAN
SECRETS
There are many of them. Scientists and
archaeologists, Egyptologists and linguists are
constantly uncovering them. In the summer of
the present 2002, engineers linked up with them. They
created a robot the size of a child's train, sent it up
into one of the great pyramids, more precisely-into one
of the pyramid's tunnels. The robot
drilled anng in a door which was blocking the
tunnel and showed behind it. . . one more door. Never mind what
the Egyptians hid behind two doors is still
unknown.
But the scientists at least are satisfied by the
fact that no ancient grave robbers have been in this
tunnel. They were
operating, you know, in the tombs of the kings over
several centuries so that only bits and pieces remain
from so very much valuable evidence of the past.
But it will not be a question of these
secrets.
The features of those secrets about which we are
speaking are visible literally to everyone who wants to
see them. And nonetheless,
the scientists point-blank don't see them. Well, and when
they do see them, they avert their eyes. The reason is
the same:
they bluntly, uncompromisingly are contrary to
the generally accepted views on Egypt's history.
In what?
Most of all in the fact that
Egypt is ancient.
It is no way ancient, the historian reformers say. And
they add:
it was a Christian state, connected in the
closest way also with the Europe of that
time, and with Rus, and even with distant
Asia. And
everything that we find here was created not in time
immemorial, but merely at that time which is called the
early Middle Ages. That is, eight-ten centuries ago.
You
will agree that it is difficult to perceive such a point
of view. Therefore, before rejecting or accepting it,
lets make an imaginary journey through the Egyptian
museums and pyramids, lets examine the famous Collosi
of Memnon and even other Egyptian marvels. And then we
shall decide who of the scientists is closer to the
truth.
Here they are, the Collosi of Memnon! Speak of
the Devil. Their height is nearly 18 meters, and the
weight of each is nearly 1,300 tonnes. Both stand guard
over a giant pylon of the mortuary
temple of
Amenophis the Third.
They have stood, as the guides assure us, for nearly
3,000 years already. When you look at them, your jaw
drops like a rock. But lets pick it
up and take a look at how the Collosi appear from
behind. And there on the back of the right monument is
carved a huge Christian cross! The left side of
the cross is chopped off. Some sort of an inscription is
visible.
In
other words, one of the most ancient monuments of the
past - supposedly from the 14th CENTURY B.C. - was made
as a huge Christian symbol. The design on the side face
of the right Collosus draws one's attention. Two men stand
along the sides of a peculiar cross and seemingly they
are lifting it with the help of a cord tied around
poles. Such
forms of T-shaped crosses are well known in Christian
tradition, although today they are not very wide-spread.
They were depicted, by the way, on old Slavic
headstones.
Perhaps this scene at the throne of the Colossus
of Memnon is none other than the well-known Christian
holiday of the Exaltation of the Cross. Apparently, one
can find this out having read the hieroglyphic
inscription included alongside. But no one has read it
for the time being. The scientists have no time. They
have to drill the pyramids.
Lets drop into the
Cairo
Egyptian
Museum. Here it is
fully packed with exhibits with crosses. The usual,
Christian. Many of them are inscribed with a circle
which forms a halo. They sometimes call them Quatari.
They were widely distributed in the
Europe of the
Middle Ages, especially in
France and
Spain.
Here then-the very same well-known Christian
symbol of the Middle Ages-of the state Orb with a cross.
And alongside- a fragment of a long wall with a number
of doors and symbolic guards from the tomb of the
pharaoh Seti I.
Over the head of the right guard again- a cross
and not far away-three figures with a five-pointed
cross, a four-pointed and birds. They are understandable
to any Christian without explanations: the four-pointed
cross is the symbol of Jesus Christ, the five-pointed is
of God the Father, and the bird is the symbol of the
Holy Spirit.
What then is proved? Either Jesus
Christ lived more than three millennia ago, or
ancient
Egypt is no older
than the Middle Ages. One of the two.
But lets wait on the conclusions. It is better
we inspect the other exhibits. For example, the wooden
carriage of the Pharaoh Tutankhamun in unassembled form.
It is marvelously well preserved for its many millennia
of age. And
at the same time, like two drops of water, it is similar
to the coaches of the European and Russian rulers of the
Middle Ages. Almost the very same coaches are shown off
today in the Armory Museum of Moscows Kremlin.
Even a
linen (!) shirt has been preserved with a Christian
cross in which Tutankhamun was buried. Besides that, the
pharaoh, it turns out, wore gloves. Well one of them is
a large, knitted glove, developed in the middle of a
century in cold Europe. Why was it
needed for Tutankhamun in
Egypt with its
50-degree (Celsius) heat, no one knows.
Nevertheless, lets not dwell on trifles. Let's
go to the main Egyptian "exhibits," known to the whole
world, the pyramids. It is not possible to restrain
ones enthusiastic emotions in view of these cyclopean
structures.
Its no joke that some of them rise more
than a hundred meters. The highest is the pyramid of
Cheops. Nearly 140 meters! Huge blocks go
by steps into the sky, toward the sun. Every one of them
weighs 15 tonnes, the guide reports. And right here the
tourists generally catch their breath: how did the
Egyptians drag these exorbitant weights to such a
height? And the guide, as they say, adds fuel to the
fire: they
carved out the massive blocks in distant quarries,
carried God knows from where is unknown and on what and
only then lifted them up and laid them so precisely that
even now you don't see gaps between the blocks.
What instruments one must have in order to carve
blocks from whole rocks with absolutely equal sides and
precise angles! What methods of transportation in order
to deliver them to the pyramid, doing no damage
anywhere!
Assumptions
immediately spring to mind about the fact that
extraterrestrials or the inhabitants of Atlantis before
it sank into the depths of the ocean obviously helped
the Egyptians. There simply can be no other explanation.
The
scientists, the nation, not inclined to being carried
away by the hypotheses of extraterrestrial helpers,
explain the whole process thus. Thousands and thousand
of slaves labored in the quarries, and then pulled the
blocks on sleds to the construction site. And with the
aid of resourceful machines or the aid of mounds of
sand, dragged the blocks up. Drawings are even published
of the presumed hoists. Construction engineers label
them as very funny, and that is in a word a bit strong,
but this doesnt embarrass the Egyptologists. Whats
what has to be explained to the tourists.
But
heres the bad luck: in the thicker of
the walls of the lower temple of the pyramid of Hefren
are found blocks from 50 to 60 cubic meters in size
weighing 150 tonnes. And in the wall of the upper temple
one block 13.4 meters long, weighing nearly 180 tonnes,
and another even more massive is 170 cubic meters in
size and weighs nearly 500 tonnes! Even in our time, the
transport of a 500 tonne stone block would be an
extremely complex problem. Never mind speaking about
Egyptians. And in general, really arent they able to
cut up this monster into several parts and carry them
gradually to the pyramid? It would be a bit lighter.
However, they didnt saw it up. What about
it?
About the
fact, the historian reformers reply, that no stone
blocks were brought from far away. With the exception of
the facing and some internal constructions, the pyramids
were executed from concrete. Right on the spot. True,
they didnt have the same concrete as now.
The
well-known chemist, a professor of Brno University,
Josef Davidovich, expressed such a hypothesis as early
as many years ago. And he not only expressed it, but
also proved that if you pound limestone, for example,
into a very fine powder, fire it, add silt from the
bottom of the Nile, and some other components, which
they have in abundance in the Egyptian sands, and then
saturate it with water, later after drying out a
concrete block will result. One can pulverize granite
and other sorts of stones. The result will be the same.
In which connection, you already cant distinguish
artificial granite from the real thing.
So,
nothing has to be carried, but simply to load the power
mix into a wooden form, saturate it with water, mix up
the solution and let it harden. Remove the form and
start to create the next block. And like so-to the very
top of the pyramid. It is simple and ordinary, without
extraterrestrials. In which connection, what is
especially important, such construction equipment and
technology corresponds exactly to the level of the
Middle Ages.
One could
relate to this hypothesis the same as to others. So what
if it occurs to the scientists! But here is the
proof. A fragment of a block of the Cheops pyramid was
taken from a height of 50 meters, from the exterior
masonry. And on its surface was discovered the
net-shaped trace of wicker matting which was shaken off
the box form for making the block. The matting left a
characteristic design on the hardened concrete. In
particular at that on the side surface that came in
contact with the form. The upper surface itself is
uneven. Thats how it
should be in the hardening of concrete, any builder
knows this. So that it gets even, they now use special
vibrators. The Egyptians didnt have anything like that.
The traces
of the form are seen on all the blocks in this part of
the pyramid. Fifty meters from the ground.
It is hard
to admit that the modern specialists, who are involved
with the pyramids, didnt notice this startling fact.
Of course they noticed. But they are trying nonetheless
to maintain the splendid fairy tail portrayed by the
Egyptologists about the great antiquity of the pyramids.
There is no end to the riddles and secrets of
Egypt, the deciphering of which leads to conclusions
directly opposite those in existence. If one tries to
summarize them, then, according to the opinion of the
historian reformers, the universally known Egyptian
funeral complexes-are imperial cemeteries. They brought
the great khan kings and other high ranking persons of
the Great Empire here to bury. Before the long journey,
their bodies were embalmed in order to prevent
decomposition. They carried them across the
Mediterranean Sea in special boats. Two of them were
preserved in the chambers of the Cheops pyramid.
The
scale itself of the funeral construction in Egypt
unambiguously shows that the Nile Delta was part of some
kind of a gigantic and powerful state which established
its own royal cemetery here. The splendor of the
funerals and the amount of the valuables that were
buried in the earth are inconceivable for Egypt, being
far from the richest state of the world, both in bygone
ages and in our time. The Egyptian burial places have no
equal in the world in the quantity of gold and jewelry.
They exceed by many orders any burial place in any other
place of the globe in their splendor.
Such
is the new reconstruction in the most common patterns of
Egypts history. Or rather, of that part of it where the
pyramids tower. They beckon people to them from the
whole planet, witnesses of our common history, in many
ways still mysterious and
incomprehensible.
R. Grishin.
|